Every once in a while I encounter an online service or Web site that is so irritating that it seems like the people behind the service are just in it to frustrate Web users. And I don’t mean the obvious candidates like email spammers and purveyors of popup ads since they’ve been around for so long I’ve either learned how to ignore and avoid them.

There is a new generation of irritants and many of them are part of the new lunacy we call “Web 2.0”

  1. Flash Widgets with Embedded PDF Documents: Somewhere along the line a bunch of startups decided that they needed to put a “Web 2.0” spin on the simple concept of hosting people’s office documents online. You see, lots of people would like to share documents in PDF or Microsoft Office® formats that aren’t particularly Web friendly. So how have sites like Scribd and Docstoc fixed this problem? By creating a Flash widgets containing the embedded PDF/Office documents like the one shown here. So not only are the documents still in a Web unfriendly format but now I can’t even download them and use the tools on my desktop to read them. It’s like let’s combine the FAIL of putting non-Web documents on the Web with the fail of a Web-unfriendly format like Flash. FAIL++. By the way, it’s pretty ironic that a Microsoft enterprise product gets this right where so many “Web 2.0” startups get it wrong.

  2. Hovering Over Links Produces Flash Widgets as Pop Over Windows: The company that takes the cake for spreading this major irritant across the blogosphere is Snap Technologies and their Snap Shots™ product. There’s nothing quite as irritating as hovering over a link on your way to click another link and leaving a wake of pop over windows with previews of the Web pages at the end of said links. I seriously wonder if anyone finds this useful?

  3. Facebook Advertisers: One of the promises of Facebook is that its users will see more relevant advertising because there is all this rich demographic data about the site’s users in their profiles. Somewhere along the line this information is either getting lost or being ignored by Facebook’s advertisers. Even though my profile says I’m married and out of my twenties I keep getting borderline sleazy ads whenever I login to play Scrabulous asking if I want to meet college girls. Then there are the ads which aren’t for dating sites but still use sleazy imagery anyway. It’s mad embarrassing whenever my wife looks over to see what I’m doing on my laptop to have dating site ads blaring in her face. Obviously she knows I’m not on a dating site but still…

  4. Forums that Require Registration Showing Up in Search Results : Every once in a while I do a Web search for a programming problem and a couple of links to Experts Exchange end up in the results. What is truly annoying about this site is that the excerpt on the search result page makes  it seem as though the answer to your question is one click away but when you click through you are greeted with “All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only”. I thought search engines had rules about banning sites with that sort of obnoxious behavior?

  5. Newspaper Websites with Interstitial Ads and Registration Requirements: Newspapers such as the New York Times often act as if they don’t really want me reading the content on their Web site. If I click on a link to a story on the New York Times site such as this one, one of two things will happen; I’m either taken to a full page animated advertisement with an option to skip the ad in relatively small font or I get a one sentence summary of the story with a notice that I need to register on their Web site before I can read the story. Either way it’s a bunch of bull crap that prevents me from getting to the news.

There are two things that strike me about this list as notable. The first is that there are an increasing number of “Web 2.0” startups out there who are actively using Flash to cause more problems than they claim to be solving. The second is that requiring registration to view content is an amazingly stupid trend that is beyond dumb. It’s not like people need to register on your site to see ads so why reduce the size of your potential audience by including this road block? That’s just stupid.

Now Playing: Pleasure P - Rock Bottom (feat. Lil Wayne)


 

Monday, 07 July 2008 15:18:48 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Scroll down on those Experts' Exchange articles. All the content is available near the bottom of the page. That's how they get away with it. :)
Monday, 07 July 2008 15:19:07 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
If you scroll down far enough (all the way to the bottom) you can actually see the answers on Experts Exchange on the very page you land on, with no need to register. That's how they aren't banned by Google. Sleazy to have to scroll past all the grayed out answers to find what you're looking for.
Monday, 07 July 2008 15:25:50 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
1. There's a 'Download file' link below presentations on Slideshare, which is the original uploaded file.
2. Adblock.
3. Adblock.
4. Scroll down.
5. Yeah, that's annoying. BugMeNot?
Anon
Monday, 07 July 2008 16:17:34 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Agree will all you've listed and have another one to add to the list.

Google Search results that have blogs posts about blog posts about blog posts...one page of results is all about one blog post.

Monday, 07 July 2008 16:34:42 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
What is truly annoying about this site is that the excerpt on the search result page makes it seem as though the answer to your question is one click away but when you click through you are greeted with “All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only”. I thought search engines had rules about banning sites with that sort of obnoxious behavior?


The funniest thing about Experts Exchange is that they go through all the rigamarole telling you that you have to register to see the answer, and then, if you scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page, you see... the answer. The complete thread on the subject. They just push it waaaaay down (making you scroll past lots of text and images that make it look like the thread is masked unless you've registered) to try and trick you into registering to see the content.
Monday, 07 July 2008 16:49:01 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I recommend the customizegoogle.com firefox extension it lets you set filters for things you don't want returned from google.

David Holden
Monday, 07 July 2008 21:31:17 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
According to Anil Dash, most "regular" users love the Snap popup thingamjigs. So I guess somebody finds them useful, or so he says.

I was going to add to your list with "sites that use CAPTCHAs", but then noticed you're using one, and wasn't sure if the remark would come off as passive/aggressive snark or not. Of course, same problem exists just by bringing this up. Oh well!
Tuesday, 08 July 2008 00:04:13 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
what's with the myth that you can't download the documents from scrib'd?
John Susek
Tuesday, 08 July 2008 00:56:01 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Check, Check, Check, Check, Check.

I have been frustrated by all of these.

@Anon, David:
Unless I miss Dare's point, it's not that these points listed are insurmountable obstacles, but rather that they are simply obstacles.
It's every author's prerogative to make their site an obstacle to their users.
And it's every user's prerogative to lambast the author and boycott the site.
Tuesday, 08 July 2008 01:10:22 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Another annoying one is those blogs where you have to click to a different page to view the comments, rather than having them appear right beneath the article.
Tuesday, 08 July 2008 01:32:48 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
And what about that RSSBandit forum on Sourceforge, eh? Requiring registration just to view the content!?

How annoying! (especially to new users with a problem who just want to look at what's up there)
Mr Kettle
Tuesday, 08 July 2008 02:12:58 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
"requiring registration to view content"

Even better, requiring registration to view someone else’s free content.
Bill
Tuesday, 08 July 2008 07:31:01 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
The great thing with experts exchange is that the content is there. For free.

When a search engine takes you to their site it looks like they have hidden all the responses. But scroll down further. After all the hidden responses are the actual responses. There, in plain text - for all to see.
Thursday, 10 July 2008 13:39:00 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
"Even though my profile says I’m married and out of my twenties I keep getting borderline sleazy ads whenever I login to play Scrabulous asking if I want to meet college girls."

You clearly need to install Adblock Plus: http://adblockplus.org/
anon
Thursday, 10 July 2008 17:01:16 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
"Agree will all you've listed and have another one to add to the list.

Google Search results that have blogs posts about blog posts about blog posts...one page of results is all about one blog post."

MSDN forums and related are the worst for this... There are at least TEN sites whose only purpose is to copy and re-display old forum posts, because they know how much us developers Google things. SO, you end up with a full page of results that are the same forum thread hosted on ten different sites. Nothing more annoying than opening 5 tabs and then realizing they all contain the same only semi-relevant information :(
Grant Bowering
Thursday, 10 July 2008 19:40:58 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
"...sleazy ads..."

Those ads are probably more targeted than you think - I'll bet you are exactly the demographic that clicks those ads (not you specifically, of course). After all, twenty-something single guys are already out there dating college girls...
Tim
Thursday, 10 July 2008 20:48:05 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
The head of the nail has been crushed! Agreed on all counts. And I will NOT be installing Silverlight anytime soon, either.
Friday, 11 July 2008 07:48:01 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
"actively using Flash to cause more problems than they claim to be solving" - like the new dilbert.com. It's ironic that the workaround is to go to dilbert.com/fast
Oran
Saturday, 12 July 2008 06:29:50 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
#2, #4, and #5 are total pet peeves of mine too. But I just learned something new about Experts Exchange from the comments, so that's cool.
Comments are closed.